Mammal detection data for the SAFE project site, Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, 2015 [HMTF]
This data set contains stacked detection matrices for 28 recorded mammal species across 115 sampling locations at the Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems (SAFE) project site located in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Information for each camera trap sampling location, including spatial information and sampling effort is included. Data were collected in order to determine the contribution of carbon-based policies to biodiversity conservation in agricultural land-use mosaics. These data are essential to the development of the occupancy detection matrix. Data were collected in 2015 during a project which was included in the NERC Human-modified tropical forest (HMTF) Programme. Full details about this dataset can be found at
https://doi.org/10.5285/62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533
- Identification
- Distribution
- Quality
- Spatial rep.
- Ref. system
- Content
- Portrayal
- Metadata
- Md. constraints
- Md. maintenance
- Schema info
Identification
Data identification
Citation
- Dataset Reference Date ()
- 2017-09-18
- Dataset Reference Date ()
- 2015-05-08
- Identifier
- doi: / 10.5285/62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533
- Other citation details
- Deere, N.J., Guillera-Arroita, G., Baking, E.L., Bernard, H., Pfeifer, M., Reynolds, G., Wearn, O.R., Davies, Z.G., Struebig, M.J. (2017). Mammal detection data for the SAFE project site, Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, 2015 [HMTF]. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre 10.5285/62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533
Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London
-
Wearn, O.R.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8258-3534
- Maintenance and update frequency
- notPlanned
Legal constraints
- Limitations on Public Access
- otherRestrictions
- Other constraints
- no limitations
Legal constraints
- Use constraints
- otherRestrictions
Legal constraints
- Use constraints
- otherRestrictions
- Other constraints
- © University of Kent 2017
Legal constraints
- Use constraints
- otherRestrictions
- Other constraints
- If you reuse this data, you should cite: Deere, N.J., Guillera-Arroita, G., Baking, E.L., Bernard, H., Pfeifer, M., Reynolds, G., Wearn, O.R., Davies, Z.G., Struebig, M.J. (2017). Mammal detection data for the SAFE project site, Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, 2015 [HMTF]. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre https://doi.org/10.5285/62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533
- Spatial representation type
- textTable
- Metadata Language
- English (en)
- Character set
- utf8
- Topic category
-
- Biota
- Begin date
- 2015-05-20
- End date
- 2015-10-08
N
S
E
W
Distribution
Distribution
- Data format
-
-
Comma-separated values (CSV)
()
-
Comma-separated values (CSV)
()
- Resource Locator
-
Download the data
Download a copy of this data
- Resource Locator
-
Supporting information
Supporting information available to assist in re-use of this dataset
Quality
Data quality
Scope
- Quality Scope
- dataset
- Other
- dataset
Report
Citation
- Dataset Reference Date ()
- 2010-12-08
- Statement
- Remotely-operated digital cameras (HC500 Hyperfire, Reconyx, Wisconsin, U.S.A.) were deployed at 130 locations across the 203 landscape between May and September 2015. These locations were separated by a mean distance of 1.4 km and distributed across an elevational gradient (mean=376 m.a.s.l.; range=64-735 m.a.s.l.). Accounting for theft, vandalism and malfunction, data were retrieved from 120 locations. Sampling was stratified within four broad habitat classes to capture the heterogeneity of the landscape: continuous logged forest, highly disturbed forest, isolated forest remnants and oil palm plantations. Due to the number of cameras available, data collection was completed over two rotations, each comprising 65 locations. Single units were deployed for 42 consecutive nights per location, yielding a total survey effort of 4,669 camera nights. Cameras were positioned at a standardised height of 30cm, on low resistance travel routes (e.g. riparian areas, logging roads, skid trails) and off-trail to account for inter- and intra-specific differences in habitat use. Prior to analyses, all images that could not be identified to species level were discarded (blurred images and photos of non-target species, equating to 17.6% of data). A detection matrix was developed for each species, whereby 42-day sampling periods were divided into six, seven-day temporal replicates. Any camera site active for fewer than seven days was excluded from analysis, leaving 115 analytical units each with 2-6 replicates. The detection matrices denote species presence ('1'), absence ('0') or camera trap malfunction ('NA') during each sampling interval. During deployment, GPS coordinates of the specific site were documented. During the processing of camera trap data we further documented the exact date and time for deployment, collection or failure in the event of malfunction. These data were used to provide an indication of sampling effort.
Ref. system
- Code
- WGS 84
Metadata
Metadata
- File identifier
- 62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533 XML
- Metadata Language
- English (en)
- Character set
- ISO/IEC 8859-1 (also known as Latin 1)
- Resource type
- dataset
- Hierarchy level name
- dataset
- Metadata Date
- 2024-03-05T08:53:15
- Metadata standard name
- UK GEMINI
- Metadata standard version
- 2.3
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre
Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg
,
Lancaster
,
LA1 4AP
,
UK
https://eidc.ac.uk/